<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Almighty T-72 tank</title> <atom:link href="http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html</link> <description>Take a load off! Babes, Bizarre News, Daily WTF News, Offbeat News, Videos and Other Interesting News</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: smarter than you</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-97192</link> <dc:creator>smarter than you</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:49:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-97192</guid> <description>If it was stuffed with TNT, which it was, you wouldn&#039;t have to &quot;radio-command detonate!&quot; it. The blast and pressure from the warhead would be more than enough to set it off becaue TNT isn&#039;t very stable.  Iraq T-72s were just assembled in country from Russian parts sold to them.  So essentially there were no &quot;homegrown&quot; T-72s for the Iraqis, just tanks that were assembled there - which has nothing to do with armor suddenly becoming weaker because armor wasn&#039;t produced there.  I seriously doubt Raytheon/Lockheed was almost sued, every defense contractor in the world does the exact same thing to peddle their goods. Lastly, it takes a second for ATGM warheads to do there thing inside these behemoths (i.e. set everything on fire). The end result is similar though, a couple dozen rounds of 100+mm ammo and 100+ gallons of fuel cooking off and you get a real nice fireworks show.  The tank won&#039;t blow to a million pieces like the pics above indicate but if you&#039;re lucky the turret pops off.  Either way - Blacktail go play Modern Warfare 2 and get off the boards. Moron.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was stuffed with TNT, which it was, you wouldn&#8217;t have to &#8220;radio-command detonate!&#8221; it. The blast and pressure from the warhead would be more than enough to set it off becaue TNT isn&#8217;t very stable.  Iraq T-72s were just assembled in country from Russian parts sold to them.  So essentially there were no &#8220;homegrown&#8221; T-72s for the Iraqis, just tanks that were assembled there &#8211; which has nothing to do with armor suddenly becoming weaker because armor wasn&#8217;t produced there.  I seriously doubt Raytheon/Lockheed was almost sued, every defense contractor in the world does the exact same thing to peddle their goods. Lastly, it takes a second for ATGM warheads to do there thing inside these behemoths (i.e. set everything on fire). The end result is similar though, a couple dozen rounds of 100+mm ammo and 100+ gallons of fuel cooking off and you get a real nice fireworks show.  The tank won&#8217;t blow to a million pieces like the pics above indicate but if you&#8217;re lucky the turret pops off.  Either way &#8211; Blacktail go play Modern Warfare 2 and get off the boards. Moron.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blacktail</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-70379</link> <dc:creator>Blacktail</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:45:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-70379</guid> <description>Like &quot;tyun&quot; said, this was FAKE. This is why;The Javelin&#039;s warhead can probably kill a T-72 with ease, but tanks knocked-out by small charges (i.e., those small enough to be used in a man-portable ATGM) don&#039;t make a big, showy explosion --- most of the mayhem takes place inside the tank, where an observer can&#039;t see it.Ever see photos of Iraqi T-72s hit by AGM-65 Maverick missiles? They suffered nowhere NEAR this much damage, despite the Maverick&#039;s warhead being several times as powerful as that of the Javelin ATGM. Iraq&#039;s &quot;home-grown&quot; T-72s are also weaker in armor composition than a standard Soviet T-72.So how did the Javelin splatter 45 tons of steel all over the landscape? The answer should be pretty obvious; it didn&#039;t, because it CAN&#039;T --- the T-72 you see above was STUFFED WITH TNT, which was radio-command detonated!Lockheed-Martin almost got sued by the T-72&#039;s (then) current manufacturer over this.This isn&#039;t the FIRST time the US Defense Industry stooped to fraud to peddle their wares, either; remember the M247 Sergeant York DIVAD?http://205.188.238.109/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1050466,00.htmlhttp://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/08-1988.pdfhttp://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/10/robot-cannon-ki/comment-page-2/#comments</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like &#8220;tyun&#8221; said, this was FAKE. This is why;</p><p>The Javelin&#8217;s warhead can probably kill a T-72 with ease, but tanks knocked-out by small charges (i.e., those small enough to be used in a man-portable ATGM) don&#8217;t make a big, showy explosion &#8212; most of the mayhem takes place inside the tank, where an observer can&#8217;t see it.</p><p>Ever see photos of Iraqi T-72s hit by AGM-65 Maverick missiles? They suffered nowhere NEAR this much damage, despite the Maverick&#8217;s warhead being several times as powerful as that of the Javelin ATGM. Iraq&#8217;s &#8220;home-grown&#8221; T-72s are also weaker in armor composition than a standard Soviet T-72.</p><p>So how did the Javelin splatter 45 tons of steel all over the landscape? The answer should be pretty obvious; it didn&#8217;t, because it CAN&#8217;T &#8212; the T-72 you see above was STUFFED WITH TNT, which was radio-command detonated!</p><p>Lockheed-Martin almost got sued by the T-72&#8242;s (then) current manufacturer over this.</p><p>This isn&#8217;t the FIRST time the US Defense Industry stooped to fraud to peddle their wares, either; remember the M247 Sergeant York DIVAD?</p><p><a
href="http://205.188.238.109/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1050466,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://205.188.238.109/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1050466,00.html</a></p><p><a
href="http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/08-1988.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/08-1988.pdf</a></p><p><a
href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/10/robot-cannon-ki/comment-page-2/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/10/robot-cannon-ki/comment-page-2/#comments</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wakas</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-39482</link> <dc:creator>wakas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:01:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-39482</guid> <description>pleas if any body have the pictures with parts names for tank T-72 in english language sent to me by mail</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pleas if any body have the pictures with parts names for tank T-72 in english language sent to me by mail</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Soko Banja</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-36358</link> <dc:creator>Soko Banja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:04:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-36358</guid> <description>Woooooow</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woooooow</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chemechie</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-17283</link> <dc:creator>Chemechie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:09:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-17283</guid> <description>This isn&#039;t Iraq - These pictures have been floating around the internet for years; they are of a Javelin test at Redstone Arsenal and are of an modified T-72 that mimics a T-80&#039;s armor.
P.S. In the 7th picture you can see NASA&#039;s Saturn engine test stand on the distant horizon - its rather distinctive.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t Iraq &#8211; These pictures have been floating around the internet for years; they are of a Javelin test at Redstone Arsenal and are of an modified T-72 that mimics a T-80&#8242;s armor.<br
/> P.S. In the 7th picture you can see NASA&#8217;s Saturn engine test stand on the distant horizon &#8211; its rather distinctive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tyun</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-14413</link> <dc:creator>tyun</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:15:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-14413</guid> <description>FAKE</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAKE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: elentir.info :: Contando Estrelas &#187; T-72 mÃ¡s misil guiado igual a&#8230;</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-14044</link> <dc:creator>elentir.info :: Contando Estrelas &#187; T-72 mÃ¡s misil guiado igual a&#8230;</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-14044</guid> <description>[...] Si pulsÃ¡is sobre esta imagen para ampliarla podrÃ©is ver que este tanque ruso T-72 estÃ¡ a punto de ser alcanzado por un misil guiado (por la forma y el tamaÃ±o dirÃ­a que se trata de un BGM-71 TOW guiado por cable). Si la foto ya es impresionante, ver el resultado del impacto lo es todavÃ­a mÃ¡s: podÃ©is comprobarlo pulsando aquÃ­. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Si pulsÃ¡is sobre esta imagen para ampliarla podrÃ©is ver que este tanque ruso T-72 estÃ¡ a punto de ser alcanzado por un misil guiado (por la forma y el tamaÃ±o dirÃ­a que se trata de un BGM-71 TOW guiado por cable). Si la foto ya es impresionante, ver el resultado del impacto lo es todavÃ­a mÃ¡s: podÃ©is comprobarlo pulsando aquÃ­. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: werwerw</title><link>http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html/comment-page-1#comment-13067</link> <dc:creator>werwerw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:53:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wackyarchives.com/world-news/the-almighty-t-72-tank.html#comment-13067</guid> <description>they don&#039;t look like Iraqi People</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they don&#8217;t look like Iraqi People</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: www.wackyarchives.com @ 2012-02-12 18:02:33 -->
