They’ve been all over the news in recent years. We still don’t know what they are: mutants, really good photoshop works or some unknown species? So let us take a look at some of most horrifying images of unidentified monsters found across the world, some only made popular by people’s ignorance.
This entry was posted on Friday, August 22nd, 2008 at 2:34 pm and is filed under Featured. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Posted by A Collection of Unidentified Monsters | August 22nd, 2008 3:06 pm [...] Original post by unknown [...] Posted by dsfa | August 22nd, 2008 3:27 pm K. Some of these are just rotting animlals…. or WELL KNOWN SEA CREATURES in the case of http://www.wackyarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/010_monsters.jpg http://www.wackyarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/009_monsters.jpg http://www.wackyarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/015_monsters.jpg is also a decaying shark. Posted by David | August 22nd, 2008 3:37 pm Lame. I’ve seen some of these before. Some are well known hoaxes. Some are photoshop’ed. And for god’s sake, a horseshoe crab? The 11th photo down? That is a reasonably common sea creature. You can see them in any decent aquarium. Posted by erichansa | August 22nd, 2008 6:26 pm Uh ha. Posted by Sean | August 22nd, 2008 6:50 pm raccoon Posted by Daniggle | August 30th, 2008 4:43 pm The 7th image from the bottom is actually a real photo, taken from a Japanese ship almost 40 years ago. They were fishing and a carcass of an animal that recently died came up in the net. Posted by Plaquinhas de banheiro « Dezanre’s Blog | October 24th, 2008 1:34 am [...] Acesse o site: A Collection of Unidentified Monsters [...] Posted by kim | November 28th, 2009 7:01 pm oh cmon sean. obviously its not a RACCOON .. can u look at it closely.. its like it has a beak or something. spot the difference between a dead raccoon, and the one on the photo.. its not like u know everytHING… Posted by SDakota | October 8th, 2012 1:44 pm For the person who said first animal is a Raccoon, that isn’t a raccoon. The structure of the nuzzle is not correct for a coon. I’ve seen mange ravaged coons too, so I’ve seen them live and dead. Its neither. The beak structure of the skull area is what makes me question if its a photoshop job. The back portion of the body appears to be too large to be feline, but the head (minus beak) looks cat-like. The forepaws are another thing that makes it strange. I wonder as I look at the image as to whether its a bloated example of a pug-nosed canine, whose muzzle is partially hidden into the sand. But none of these images are that difficult to Identify. While intriguing to review, they clearly not “Monsters” but merely animals at different levels of decay. Post a comment |
Recent postsCategories Friends
|
